Why Kat Izzo Wasn’t The Bachelor Villain Producers Wanted Her To Be

The Bachelor producers seemed determined to make Katherine “Kat” Izzo the villain of Zach Shallcross’ season, but their plan backfired because she was charming and relatable. Her so-called devious actions paled in comparison to the antics of previous seasons’ antagonists. From the beginning, Kat and Zach really connected. Kat also bonded with her fellow contestants, and was portrayed as a hero. It was impressive when she stood up to Christina Mandrell, after she asked why Charity Lawson received a group date rose. In the Bahamas, Zach and Kat spent the day sailing and snorkeling. He said that he couldn’t believe he was on a date with a woman like Kat.

After Zach and the women were separated in London due to his COVID-19 diagnosis, Kat was criticized by her fellow contestants, who didn’t like her conduct. The Bachelor‘s Zach Shallcross left on his one-on-one date in Estonia with Charity, Kat pulled him aside and kissed him. This bothered the other women, especially Brooklyn Willie. In Budapest, the women met with a mentalist, and Kat admitted that she sometimes wanted to escape when things got hard. However, she added that she hoped to be with Zach forever. Zach later eliminated her at the rose ceremony, blindsiding her. Ultimately, Kat was not the villain producers wanted her to be.

Related: Why The Bachelor Fans Think Zach Shallcross Eliminated Christina Mandrell

The Bachelor’s Kat Izzo Handled Herself With Class

When Brooklyn first confronted Kat about her interaction with Zach, Kat tried to laugh it off. However, Brooklyn called her classless and selfish, which was hurtful. Kat didn’t respond with personal attacks against Brooklyn, even though it would have been understandable. Ariel Frenkel also spoke to Kat, who felt that after Zach had COVID-19, all the rules shifted. Ariel told her that she didn’t think that respect ever shifted. Brooklyn and Kat continued to butt heads about what Kat did. When Charity pulled Kat aside to chat, Brooklyn interrupted. As a result, Kat became flustered, and her vibe with Zach was off that night. However, she did receive a rose.

Although Brooklyn was very outspoken about Kat’s actions, to Kat’s credit, she did not speak to Zach about it. In the past, other women have used situations like these to gain sympathy from the lead, but Kat didn’t. Brooklyn might have been right in the beginning, but her inability to drop the subject could have pushed Kat over the edge. However, she did not become confrontational with the women, as other Bachelor villains have in the past.

All’s Fair In Love On The Bachelor

Although Kat might have chosen the wrong moment (before Charity’s date) to steal Zach away, she had a point about COVID-19 throwing the rules out of the window. On The Bachelor, time is precious, so what was perceived as Kat’s aggressiveness could instead be viewed as assertiveness. She pursued the man she was dating to make herself stand out among the remaining women, and that isn’t wrong. Her decision really didn’t hurt anyone, as Charity still had a wonderful one-on-one date with Zach. However, the moment allowed Kat to have a little bit of time with the man who, in just a few weeks, might have become her fiance.

Additionally, The Bachelor women’s anger towards Kat was misplaced. Kat asked Zach if she could speak to him, and he agreed. He could have said no. She also asked him if she could kiss him, and he consented. If Kat was a villain in this situation, then so was Zach. However, the truth of the matter was that they just wanted to spend a moment together, since they’d been separated.

Related: Why The Bachelor Shouldn’t Have An America’s First Impression Rose Again

The Bachelor’s Kat Izzo’s Doubts Were Understandable

Zach was concerned when Kat expressed doubts about him meeting her family before hometowns. However, it would have been strange if Kat didn’t have concerns. Zach was also dating six other women at the time, so none of them could feel truly confident that they were “The One.” There was nothing villainous about Kat needing more validation from Zach about his feelings for her before she brought him home to meet her family. Her feelings were sensible, and only natural in this situation.

The Bachelor’s Kat Izzo Really Isn’t That Bad

Zach’s Bachelor season has been relatively tame compared to previous ones. Kat’s actions were nothing compared with those of Shanae Ankney from Clayton Echard’s season. She weaponized fellow contestant Elizabeth Corrigan’s ADHD, issued a fake apology to the women after antagonizing them, and caused so much unnecessary drama in the house. Courtney Robertson from Ben Flajnik’s season lived by the motto, “I didn’t come here to make friends.” She even wrote a book with that title. Kat was a great pal to many of the other women, and truly did not seem to want to make waves.

The Bachelor’s Kat might have made some mistakes, but she was far from a manipulative villain. The whole season has been very calm, so the producers wanted Kat to be the antagonist, but their plan failed. In fact, Kat is a strong contender to be the next The Bachelorette or Bachelor in Paradise contestant. She showed that she is able to be open and vulnerable. She is also ready to find love. Kat is a favorite despite her portrayal, which proves that her true personality rose above the producers’ edit.

More: Where Did The Bachelor’s Zach Shallcross Play College Football

The Bachelor airs Mondays at 8 p.m. ET on ABC.

Source: Kat Izzo/Instagram, Kat Izzo/Instagram

Source link

The post Why Kat Izzo Wasn’t The Bachelor Villain Producers Wanted Her To Be appeared first on Biz grows.